tanszek:oktatas:iss_t:evolution_of_software_integration_methods
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
tanszek:oktatas:iss_t:evolution_of_software_integration_methods [2023/03/26 18:33] – [Middleware development method] knehez | tanszek:oktatas:iss_t:evolution_of_software_integration_methods [2025/02/17 10:11] (current) – [Development on a software "Virtual Machine"] knehez | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | Following figure shows the six classical | + | ==== Six Standard |
- | {{tanszek: | + | {{tanszek: |
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
* the standard handling of used dependencies (components developed by others) is not uniform, but after 2020, we can use [[https:// | * the standard handling of used dependencies (components developed by others) is not uniform, but after 2020, we can use [[https:// | ||
- | * RELEASE/ | + | * RELEASE/ |
* it is possible that the operation of the program is different (erroneous, slower) with another compiler | * it is possible that the operation of the program is different (erroneous, slower) with another compiler | ||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
* LLVM: this is not the classic VM, but it compiles the source into an llvm byte code, which then turns into native code. "LLVM is designed around a language-independent intermediate representation that serves as a portable, high-level assembly language that can be optimized with a variety of transformations over multiple passes. | * LLVM: this is not the classic VM, but it compiles the source into an llvm byte code, which then turns into native code. "LLVM is designed around a language-independent intermediate representation that serves as a portable, high-level assembly language that can be optimized with a variety of transformations over multiple passes. | ||
- | **Just in Time (JIT) translation** | + | **Just in Time (JIT) compilation** |
* The virtual machine can continuously optimize the application code, the byte code conversion is dynamic. | * The virtual machine can continuously optimize the application code, the byte code conversion is dynamic. | ||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
Application server development method. It was originally released by Sun Microsystems in 1999 under the name J2EE (Java 2 Enterprise Edition). The standard specification is currently at version 8 (2017): https:// | Application server development method. It was originally released by Sun Microsystems in 1999 under the name J2EE (Java 2 Enterprise Edition). The standard specification is currently at version 8 (2017): https:// | ||
- | * It typically uses middleware implemented in Java. Better known (26) Java middleware | + | * It typically uses middleware implemented in Java. [[https:// |
* famous implementations: | * famous implementations: | ||
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
In the first versions, metadata was managed with XML descriptors. In these, it was possible to specify how a class should behave: URL mapping, number of running instances, etc. | In the first versions, metadata was managed with XML descriptors. In these, it was possible to specify how a class should behave: URL mapping, number of running instances, etc. | ||
+ | ==== ESB - Enterprise service bus ==== | ||
+ | {{tanszek: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Service BUS: Service Oriented Architecture (SOA). It is based on loosely coupled components (services). Analogy of the BUS concept known in networks. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Main functions**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Message forwarding - Message Routing between services | ||
+ | * Service discovery | ||
+ | * Support conversion of different protocols | ||
+ | * Validation - schema validation | ||
+ | * Version management of services | ||
+ | * Monitoring services | ||
+ | * Business process management | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Advantages: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * easily scalable use - from local service to full enterprise access | ||
+ | * instead of implementing (coding) the integration, | ||
+ | * services can be easily started and stopped due to loose connection | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Disadvantages: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * slow communication | ||
+ | * due to centralization, | ||
+ | * high complexity in configuration | ||
+ | |||
+ | Known implementations: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Azure Service Bus, Microsoft Biztalk Server, Mule ESB, Oracle ESB, IBM Websphere ESB, JBOSS ESB | ||
tanszek/oktatas/iss_t/evolution_of_software_integration_methods.1679855625.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/03/26 18:33 by knehez