Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- tanszek:oktatas:iss_t:object_request_broker [2026/03/01 17:53] – [IDL – Interface Definition Language] knehez
+++ tanszek:oktatas:iss_t:object_request_broker [2026/03/01 17:58] (current) – [Object Request Broker (ORB)] knehez
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 Conceptually:
-Client -> ORB -> Remote Object
+<mermaid>
+sequenceDiagram
-Remote Object -> ORB -> Client
+Client->>ORB: Method call
+ORB->>RemoteObject: Forward request
+RemoteObject-->>ORB: Return result
+ORB-->>Client: Return response
+</mermaid>
 The ORB handles all low-level details such as transport protocols and data encoding.
@@ Line 65: / Line 69: @@
 IDL was one of the early solutions to cross-language service integration.
+CORBA IDL supports interface inheritance, allowing one interface to extend another.
+This enables the reuse of method definitions and supports polymorphism in distributed systems.
+Below is an example from a simplified employee management system.
+<sxh>
+module Company {
+interface Person {
+   string getName();
+   long getId();
+};
+interface Employee : Person {
+   double getSalary();
+   void setSalary(in double newSalary);
+};
+interface Manager : Employee {
+   void addTeamMember(in Person p);
+};
+};
+</sxh>
 ----
 ==== Marshalling and Unmarshalling ====
@@ Line 84: / Line 115: @@
 This ensures that data types remain consistent across systems, different hardware architectures can communicate, and programming language differences are abstracted.
+----
@@ Line 102: / Line 132: @@
 Services were browsable in a uniform manner, which was advanced for its time.
+----
 ==== Known Implementations ====
@@ Line 122: / Line 153: @@
   * legacy enterprise infrastructures.
+----
 ==== Why CORBA Declined ====