Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- tanszek:oktatas:techcomm:information_-_basics:sciences [2024/09/09 21:02] – [Inductive Sciences] knehez
+++ tanszek:oktatas:techcomm:information_-_basics:sciences [2024/09/12 17:53] (current) – [Deductive Sciences] knehez
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 //Science// has been highlighted because of the following criteria from our historically established social forms of consciousness:
-  * they possess high-reaching concepts or logical tools to formulate or express broad, general or universal **principles** or **laws** (e.g. gravity, axioms, Maxwell's equations)
+  * they possess high-reaching concepts or logical tools to formulate or express broad, general or universal **principles** or **laws** (e.g. gravity, axioms, [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_equations|Maxwell's equations]])
   * they can describe the objective **conditions** under which these principles or laws will prevail.
@@ Line 88: / Line 88: @@
 Logic can only state that the results will be true if the premises are true (and consistent) and the arguments are logically correct.
-//Bonus Content//:
+**Example**:
 János Bólyai – a famous Hungarian mathematician – wrote this famous sentence to his father:
@@ Line 99: / Line 99: @@
 {{:tanszek:oktatas:techcomm:information_-_basics:pasted:20240908-180605.png?320x220}}
+The quote from [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niels_Bohr|Niels Bohr]], //"In the Institute, we only have one piece of experimental equipment: a ping-pong table"// is a good example of reductive reasoning in science. It suggests that groundbreaking discoveries can be achieved not through extensive experimental setups but rather through the adjustment of theoretical laws and conditions. Bohr highlights the power of thought experiments and abstract reasoning, emphasising that manipulating underlying principles can lead to new insights without always needing physical experimentation.
 ====== Reductive Sciences ======
@@ Line 105: / Line 107: @@
-**Explanation**: these type of tasks are typical examples of technical sciences.  However, sadly the solution cannot be inverted from the end results, therefore there can be an infinite number of terms which can get us to the known results. In this case we have to accept a few  possibilities (or more usually only one). We usually get to this term in heuristic ways.
+**Explanation**: These types of tasks are typical examples of technical sciences. Unfortunately, the solution cannot be inverted from the end results; therefore, there can be an infinite number of terms that can get us to the known results. In this case, we have to accept a few possibilities (or, more usually, only one). We usually get to this term in **[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic|heuristic ways]]**.
-We can face another interpretation of reduction in the classification of elementary scientific problems (the so-called ’Trinity’ of sciences).
+We can face another interpretation of reduction in classifying elementary scientific problems (the so-called ’Trinity’ of sciences).
@@ Line 131: / Line 133: @@
     - The performance depends on factors like indexing, table size, query structure, and features of database engine.
     - The result of the query must remain the same regardless of the optimization.
-  - **Seeking Appropriate Conditions:**
+  - **Seeking Appropriate Conditions:** The task is to optimize the query by structuring it to minimize response time and resource usage.
-    - The task is to optimize the query by structuring it in a way that minimizes response time and resource usage.
     - **There’s no single “perfect” solution**  for optimizing the query, because different query structures can yield the same result, but with varying degrees of performance based on the specific context (e.g., hardware, data distribution, and load).
     - Additionally, the same query might perform differently on different database engines (e.g., MySQL vs. PostgreSQL), and therefore there can be an infinite number of ways to structure a query that achieves the same end result.
-  - **Reducing the Number of Solutions:**
+  - **Reducing the Number of Conditions:**: The database administrator (DBA) or developer uses **heuristic methods** like:
-    - The database administrator (DBA) or developer uses heuristic methods like:
+    - Query profiling tools (e.g., EXPLAIN in SQL) to examine how different query structures perform.
-      - Query profiling tools (e.g., EXPLAIN in SQL) to examine how different query structures perform.
+    - Applying **best practices** like indexing the right columns, minimizing nested queries, and using joins effectively.
-      - Applying **best practices** like indexing the right columns, minimizing nested queries, and using joins effectively.
     - By profiling and tweaking different versions of the query, the developer reduces the number of possible query structures to a few that perform optimally in the given context.
-    - There may not be a “single” optimal solution, but the best solution is found by reducing the possibilities through trial and error, experience, and tools.
 The //reductive approach// in database query optimization involves narrowing down many possible solutions (query structures) to a few practical ones. The solution can’t simply be inverted from the final result (i.e., retrieving the data); instead, developers use heuristics, profiling, and experience to eliminate inefficient options and find the most effective query structure for their specific environment.