Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- tanszek:oktatas:techcomm:information_-_basics:sciences [2024/09/09 21:21] – [Reductive Sciences] knehez
+++ tanszek:oktatas:techcomm:information_-_basics:sciences [2025/09/08 19:42] (current) – [Deductive Sciences] knehez
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== What is science? ======
-According to the definition: //Science// is understood as the provable and fact-based system of the objective relationships between //nature//, //society//, and //thinking//.
+According to the definition: //Science// is understood as a provable and fact-based system of the objective relationships between //nature//, //society//, and //thinking//.
-//Science// is not just a collection of knowledge, but a discovery process. //Science// aims to discover new information, facts, and answers about our world or the universe.
+//Science// is not just a collection of knowledge, but a **discovery process**. //Science// aims to discover new information, facts, and answers about our world or the universe.
-//Science// is distinguished from other historically established forms of social consciousness by the following characteristics:
+Science, among our historically established forms of social consciousness, is distinguished and emphasized by the following characteristics.
-//Science// has been highlighted because of the following criteria from our historically established social forms of consciousness:
   * they possess high-reaching concepts or logical tools to formulate or express broad, general or universal **principles** or **laws** (e.g. gravity, axioms, [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_equations|Maxwell's equations]])
@@ Line 16: / Line 14: @@
 According to **principles**, **conditions** (circumstances), and **results** (these three general aspects) we can categorize every scientific problem into the following problem groups.
+----
 ====== Inductive Sciences ======
@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 **Explanation:** //Induction// is probably the most important logical method used by scientists to draft new //theories// or //principles//.
-Induction is a generalizing method, which means that we seek a universal or general law from a given set of data with fixed conditions. A well-known example of this method is the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mendelian_inheritance|Mendelian laws of inheritance]].
+Induction is a generalizing method, which means that we seek a universal or general law from a given set of data with fixed conditions. A well-known example of this method is the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mendelian_inheritance|Mendelian laws of inheritance]] or [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler%27s_laws_of_planetary_motion| Kepler's law of planetary motion]]
-The biggest problem with this method is whether we have (or have yet to) carry out sufficient observations to arrive at a general conclusion.
+The biggest problem with this method is whether we have (or have yet to) carry out //sufficient observations// to arrive at a general conclusion.
 In natural sciences, we are always dealing with partial induction. The more experiments we do, the more confident we will become and the better our chances of understanding the connections.
@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 **Remark**: Legislative processes are based on an inductive method that analyzes social problems and their causes and makes new laws as a conclusion.
-**Example**: In **information technology**, mathematical induction can be applied to many areas, including algorithm analysis and data structures. One typical example is proving the correctness of algorithms or the properties of data structures like trees. Here’s an example from **binary trees**:
+----
+**Example 1**: In **information technology**, mathematical induction can be applied to many areas, including algorithm analysis and data structures. One typical example is proving the correctness of algorithms or the properties of data structures like trees. Here’s an example from **binary trees**:
 **Problem**:
@@ Line 56: / Line 58: @@
   - **Inductive Hypothesis**: Assume that for any binary tree with \(k\) nodes, the number of edges is \(k-1\).
   - **Inductive Step**: We must prove that if the statement holds for a binary tree with \(k\) nodes, then it also holds for a binary tree with \(k+1\) nodes. \\ Suppose we add one more node to the binary tree, bringing the total number of nodes to \(k+1\). When we add this node, we also add exactly one edge connecting the new node to an existing node in the tree (either as a left or right child of a parent node). \\ \\ By the inductive hypothesis, the tree with \(k\) nodes has \((k - 1)\) edges. Adding one more node introduces one additional edge, so the number of edges in the tree with \((k + 1)\) nodes is: $$ (k-1) + 1 = k $$ This matches the formula for the number of edges in a tree with \((k + 1)\) nodes, which should be \((k-1) + 1 = k\).
+----
+**Example 2**: Sum of consecutive natural numbers. **Claim**:
+$$ 1 + 2 + \cdots + n = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}. $$
+Base case (n=1):
+$$ 1 = \frac{1 \cdot 2}{2} = 1, $$
+so the statement holds.
+**Inductive step**:
+Assume the formula is true for \(n = k\):
+$$ 1 + 2 + \cdots + k = \frac{k(k+1)}{2}. $$
+**Simplify**:
+$$ \frac{k(k+1) + 2(k+1)}{2} = \frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}. $$
+Thus, the formula also holds for \( n = k+1 \).
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_induction
+----
 ====== Deductive Sciences ======
@@ Line 88: / Line 115: @@
 Logic can only state that the results will be true if the premises are true (and consistent) and the arguments are logically correct.
-//Bonus Content//:
+**Example**:
 János Bólyai – a famous Hungarian mathematician – wrote this famous sentence to his father:
@@ Line 99: / Line 126: @@
 {{:tanszek:oktatas:techcomm:information_-_basics:pasted:20240908-180605.png?320x220}}
+The quote from [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niels_Bohr|Niels Bohr]], //"In the Institute, we only have one piece of experimental equipment: a ping-pong table"// is a good example of reductive reasoning in science. It suggests that groundbreaking discoveries can be achieved not through extensive experimental setups but rather through the adjustment of theoretical laws and conditions. Bohr highlights the power of thought experiments and abstract reasoning, emphasising that manipulating underlying principles can lead to new insights without always needing physical experimentation.
+----
 ====== Reductive Sciences ======