tanszek:oktatas:techcomm:information_-_basics:sciences
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| tanszek:oktatas:techcomm:information_-_basics:sciences [2024/09/12 17:53] – [Deductive Sciences] knehez | tanszek:oktatas:techcomm:information_-_basics:sciences [2025/09/15 17:52] (current) – [Inductive Sciences] knehez | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== What is science? ====== | ====== What is science? ====== | ||
| - | According to the definition: //Science// is understood as the provable and fact-based system of the objective relationships between //nature//, // | + | According to the definition: //Science// is understood as a provable and fact-based system of the objective relationships between //nature//, // |
| - | // | + | However, science |
| - | //Science// is distinguished from other historically established forms of social consciousness by the following characteristics: | + | //Science// is not just a collection |
| - | //Science// has been highlighted because of the following criteria from our historically established | + | Science, among our historically established forms of social |
| - | * they possess | + | * It possesses |
| | | ||
| - | * they can describe the objective **conditions** under which these principles or laws will prevail. | + | * It can describe the objective **conditions** under which these principles or laws will prevail. |
| - | * they possess the required | + | * It provides |
| - | According to **principles**, | + | From a modern engineering viewpoint, these features mean that science is not abstract—it is applied, testable, and useful. Every time an engineer uses mathematical models to optimize a production line, simulates a digital twin of a factory, or analyzes big data to predict outcomes, they are applying these scientific principles. |
| + | |||
| + | According to the three general aspects — **principles**, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| ====== Inductive Sciences ====== | ====== Inductive Sciences ====== | ||
| Line 32: | Line 36: | ||
| **Explanation: | **Explanation: | ||
| - | Induction is a generalizing method, which means that we seek a universal or general law from a given set of data with fixed conditions. A well-known example of this method is the [[https:// | + | Induction is a generalizing method, which means that we seek a universal or general law from a given set of data with fixed conditions. A well-known example of this method is the [[https:// |
| - | The biggest problem with this method is whether we have (or have yet to) carry out sufficient observations to arrive at a general conclusion. | + | The biggest problem with this method is whether we have (or have yet to) carry out //sufficient observations// to arrive at a general conclusion. |
| In natural sciences, we are always dealing with partial induction. The more experiments we do, the more confident we will become and the better our chances of understanding the connections. | In natural sciences, we are always dealing with partial induction. The more experiments we do, the more confident we will become and the better our chances of understanding the connections. | ||
| Line 44: | Line 48: | ||
| **Remark**: Legislative processes are based on an inductive method that analyzes social problems and their causes and makes new laws as a conclusion. | **Remark**: Legislative processes are based on an inductive method that analyzes social problems and their causes and makes new laws as a conclusion. | ||
| - | **Example**: | + | ---- |
| + | |||
| + | **Example | ||
| **Problem**: | **Problem**: | ||
| Line 56: | Line 62: | ||
| - **Inductive Hypothesis**: | - **Inductive Hypothesis**: | ||
| - **Inductive Step**: We must prove that if the statement holds for a binary tree with \(k\) nodes, then it also holds for a binary tree with \(k+1\) nodes. \\ Suppose we add one more node to the binary tree, bringing the total number of nodes to \(k+1\). When we add this node, we also add exactly one edge connecting the new node to an existing node in the tree (either as a left or right child of a parent node). \\ \\ By the inductive hypothesis, the tree with \(k\) nodes has \((k - 1)\) edges. Adding one more node introduces one additional edge, so the number of edges in the tree with \((k + 1)\) nodes is: $$ (k-1) + 1 = k $$ This matches the formula for the number of edges in a tree with \((k + 1)\) nodes, which should be \((k-1) + 1 = k\). | - **Inductive Step**: We must prove that if the statement holds for a binary tree with \(k\) nodes, then it also holds for a binary tree with \(k+1\) nodes. \\ Suppose we add one more node to the binary tree, bringing the total number of nodes to \(k+1\). When we add this node, we also add exactly one edge connecting the new node to an existing node in the tree (either as a left or right child of a parent node). \\ \\ By the inductive hypothesis, the tree with \(k\) nodes has \((k - 1)\) edges. Adding one more node introduces one additional edge, so the number of edges in the tree with \((k + 1)\) nodes is: $$ (k-1) + 1 = k $$ This matches the formula for the number of edges in a tree with \((k + 1)\) nodes, which should be \((k-1) + 1 = k\). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Example 2**: Sum of consecutive natural numbers. **Claim**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$ 1 + 2 + \cdots + n = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}. $$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Base case (n=1): | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$ 1 = \frac{1 \cdot 2}{2} = 1, $$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | so the statement holds. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Inductive step**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Assume the formula is true for \(n = k\): | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$ 1 + 2 + \cdots + k = \frac{k(k+1)}{2}. $$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Then for \(n = k+1\): | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$ 1 + 2 + \cdots + k + (k+1) = \frac{k(k+1)}{2} + (k+1). $$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Simplify**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$ \frac{k(k+1)}{2} + (k+1) = \frac{k(k+1) + 2(k+1)}{2} = \frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}. $$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thus, the formula also holds for \( n = k+1 \). Thus, by mathematical induction, the formula holds for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\) | ||
| + | |||
| https:// | https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| ====== Deductive Sciences ====== | ====== Deductive Sciences ====== | ||
| Line 101: | Line 138: | ||
| The quote from [[https:// | The quote from [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| ====== Reductive Sciences ====== | ====== Reductive Sciences ====== | ||
tanszek/oktatas/techcomm/information_-_basics/sciences.1726163606.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/09/12 17:53 by knehez
