tanszek:oktatas:techcomm:information_-_basics:sciences
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| tanszek:oktatas:techcomm:information_-_basics:sciences [2025/09/08 19:42] – [Deductive Sciences] knehez | tanszek:oktatas:techcomm:information_-_basics:sciences [2025/09/15 17:52] (current) – [Inductive Sciences] knehez | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== What is science? ====== | ====== What is science? ====== | ||
| - | According to the definition: //Science// is understood as a provable and fact-based system of the objective relationships between //nature//, // | + | According to the definition: //Science// is understood as a provable and fact-based system of the objective relationships between //nature//, // |
| - | //Science// is not just a collection of knowledge, but a **discovery process**. | + | However, science is not only a set of theories stored in textbooks. It is a dynamic process of exploration and innovation that directly shapes technology, industry, and daily life. Science is the reason we can design sustainable energy systems, create AI-powered applications, |
| + | |||
| + | //Science// is not just a collection of knowledge, but an ongoing | ||
| Science, among our historically established forms of social consciousness, | Science, among our historically established forms of social consciousness, | ||
| - | * they possess | + | * It possesses |
| | | ||
| - | * they can describe the objective **conditions** under which these principles or laws will prevail. | + | * It can describe the objective **conditions** under which these principles or laws will prevail. |
| + | |||
| + | * It provides logical methods and computational tools that enable us to calculate, simulate, and predict **results** under specific circumstances. | ||
| - | * they possess the required logical tools or methods | + | From a modern engineering viewpoint, these features mean that science is not abstract—it is applied, testable, and useful. Every time an engineer uses mathematical models |
| - | According to **principles**, | + | According to the three general aspects — **principles**, |
| ---- | ---- | ||
| Line 76: | Line 80: | ||
| $$ 1 + 2 + \cdots + k = \frac{k(k+1)}{2}. $$ | $$ 1 + 2 + \cdots + k = \frac{k(k+1)}{2}. $$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Then for \(n = k+1\): | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$ 1 + 2 + \cdots + k + (k+1) = \frac{k(k+1)}{2} + (k+1). $$ | ||
| **Simplify**: | **Simplify**: | ||
| - | $$ \frac{k(k+1) + 2(k+1)}{2} = \frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}. $$ | ||
| - | Thus, the formula also holds for \( n = k+1 \). | + | $$ \frac{k(k+1)}{2} + (k+1) = \frac{k(k+1) + 2(k+1)}{2} = \frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}. $$ |
| + | |||
| + | Thus, the formula also holds for \( n = k+1 \). Thus, by mathematical induction, the formula holds for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\) | ||
| https:// | https:// | ||
tanszek/oktatas/techcomm/information_-_basics/sciences.1757360568.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/09/08 19:42 by knehez
